Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoğlu gathered journalists on a sunny Sunday noon for a briefing on his recent tour of Europe. As the newly elected mayor of Istanbul, İmamoğlu visited Paris, Copenhagen, Berlin and London. He was greeted with much attention wherever he went.
The interest in Imamoğlu in Europe is strong — whether realistic or not, he is seen as a potential presidential candidate against Erdoğan. The European press does not usually ask him about Istanbul, but instead about his opinion on the European Union and the place of Turkey in the union. Apparently he is being perceived as a leader who would possibly be able to put Turkey on the right track. Whether he has this potential is yet to be seen.
However, he is shifting into higher gear, it seems: the press meeting last Sunday was an indicator of that. During the meeting, which lasted around three hours, Imamoğlu said that state banks had stopped making routine loans to the city after his election. He stated that he visited Europe in part to search for alternative finance resources, and announced that he secured a 86-million-euro loan deal from the French Development Agency, and a 110-million-euro loan from Deutsche Bank.
The construction of two new subway lines will be completed with these financial resources, he said. Imamoğlu underlined that construction had been in progress on eight lines under the former mayor. However, construction had stalled on these projects for the last two years due to lack of funds.
After the local elections Erdoğan openly said, “Even if they win, they will not be able to govern, we know how much debt each municipality is in.” He signaled that life for the newly elected opposition mayors will be harder than ever.
Imamoğlu ran his election campaign not on a narrative of fighting, but a narrative of peace. He promised to be inclusive, and he was careful not to target Erdoğan in his speeches. He aimed to grab AKP votes and he achieved this. He was able to reach AKP constituents by not demonizing Erdoğan and by saying that he stay out of Ankara politics and focus on Istanbul. So far, he’s tried to hold true to that: he has been careful not to comment about everyday politics, and stay above the brawl. However, it is not easy to stay as clean as a whistle once in power. Local politics in Turkey still drags one into the obscure dealings of Ankara. At the end of the day, now Turkey is governed by a very centralized system, and everything is decided at Beştepe Palace, where Erdoğan resides.
İmamoğlu concluded his press briefing on Sunday by saying that he believed this was still an adaptation phase, that it was hard for AKP, the party in power for 25 years, to get used to opposition in Istanbul. He said he believed this phase will end and they will find a way to work with Ankara in peace. One can assume that, as a good politician, he hid his real thoughts. But by starting to be vocal about the difficulties he is facing, he signaled that he is ready to fight.
In a meeting between Mr Erdoğan and his party’s MPs, some MPs voiced their concerns about Turkish soap operas that they found to be not suitable for Turkish values and culture. According to the reports, Mr. Erdoğan agreed with the MPs and told them he was disturbed as well. When the President voices a concern about a matter, a new decree or law usually follows.
The chaos that occurred after the June 2015 election worked for Erdoğan, but his approval ratings tend to fall when terror attacks or wars halt and people start worrying about the economy. According to Metropoll, the last time Erdoğan’s approval rating was higher than 50 percent was 2018; the economy seems to be taking its toll on Erdoğan.
Up until now, the local businessmen used to support AKP without reservation, and it used to be a win-win situation for both parties. However, this cooperation seems to be fading. When Suriçi Group Platform hosts CHP chair Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, it is a significant development for Turkish politics.
There is the talk of early elections, both on the street and in back rooms. There is an expectation that some change will occur. The Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) has a more critical part to play in Turkish politics. However, it seems that it won’t be easy for the HDP to keep their traditional voter base satisfied while becoming a more relevant actor in the upcoming political period.
While many of the pro-government figures in Turkey were preaching about what sort of a villain Soleimani was, the Turkish secular left was busy describing him as the “Che Guevara of the Middle East.” Though it depends on how one perceives Che Guevara, the comparison was supposed to be a compliment to Soleimani’s legacy.
Totalitarian systems usually come up with their own ideal man. Tayyip Erdoğan believes the future of his Turkey lies in İmam Hatip school education. He believes the only way to create his “ideal man” is to educate young Turkish people in line with the strict religious education of the imam hatip schools. As Erdoğan became stronger, so did the imam hatip schools.
President Erdoğan’s military advisor and the founder of the armed group SADAT, recently suggested that Islamic unity will be possible when Mahdi comes. Erdoğan’s military advisor announcing his mission to prepare for Mahdi’s arrival is definitely not a good sign for Turkey’s near future.
Horses tumbling down and breathing their last breaths, while still being harnessed to the carriage has also turned into an everyday scene at the Princes’ Islands of Istanbul. Weak, limping horses trying to pull crowded families up the hills, often looks like a horror scene from a dystopian movie.
Led by Erdoğan, the AKP has been reshaping the secular life of Turks for the last 17 years, bit by bit. The latest in the line of religiously-inspired incidents happened in Adana, a southern Turkish city with a unique character whose people are proud of their city, their type of kabab and their Adana ways.
Last Sunday, women gathered in one of the Istanbul’s busy centers, Kadıköy. Their aim was to protest violence against women and the inaction of the state. However, as usual in recent years in Turkey, the police jumped in and dispersed the crowd, detaining some of the women protesters.
Turkey is now being ruled by an exceptional version of a presidential system. Everything is ultimately decided by the President, with ministries and the legislative branch having a marginal influence. But he also wants citizens to be able to reach the Palace directly. And CIMER is the answer!
Gas prices have doubled overnight in Iran. Since Nov. 15, street protests and riots have been spreading. The protests started peacefully, but turned violent fairly quickly. The security forces were relentless: they had no intention of tolerating this public objection to the price increase.
One of the heaviest financial crises in Turkey’s history was in 2001. It first became public symbolically when a salesman threw a cash till at then-Prime Minister Bülent Ecevit. The man threw the giant cash box in front of the cameras as Ecevit was walking into his office. As the till hit the floor and shattered into pieces, the salesman yelled, “We are struggling!” The incident symbolically marked the beginning of the end of the Ecevit era.
The Sevres Syndrome has been a factor that impedes rationality for many Turkish citizens trying to make some sense of global dynamics. In recent years, Turkish-American relations have deteriorated at an unprecedented rate. For many Turks, this was simply another example of hatred against the Turks, this time coming from across the ocean. However, even in the more rational circles in Turkey, it is almost impossible to hear critical analysis concerning Turkey’s responsibility in the failing relationship.
After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Turks established the Turkish Republic. However, even the issue of what to celebrate proves that Turks have a long road ahead before they feel like a truly united nation that shares similar ideals and prospects for future.
According to Turkish civil law, the party who has the economic advantage in the marriage is to pay for children’s expenses and some expenses of the former spouse. In most cases the economic advantage is with the men, since on the one hand many men do not want their wives to work during the marriage and also social inequalities cause men to be the breadwinners of the families, not the women.