The controversial Kanal Istanbul project, dubbed by President Erdoğan as a “crazy project,” is ready to be launched amid reactions from the opposition as well as scientists.
The Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Cahit Tarhan announced on Monday that Kanal Istanbul will be an alternative to Bosphorus and will ensure the safety of the megacity. Tarhan, aware of the criticism of prominent scientists, remarked that they don’t have direct knowledge about the subject but that the project has been prepared with great care.
Well-known geologists, architects, climatologists, environmental engineers, and activists have opposed the project ever since Erdoğan announced it in 2011, saying that Kanal Istanbul, along with the third bridge and the “New Airport,” would bring an end to Istanbul.
By cutting down valuable forests, drying up water resources critical for the mega city, and killing endemic species, the combined impact of these projects will result in an immense construction frenzy in the northern part of Istanbul, not to mention the effects on climate change. Officially, the megacity has a population of 16 million. The addition of new housing to the north will bring an additional two million people.
The government always ignored these warnings, as well as the risk the Kanal will bring when the expected earthquake happens. Prof. Naci Görür, geologist and earthquake expert, warned that the Kanal Istanbul project exacerbates the damage that the city is likely to face in a few decades from a predicted high-magnitude earthquake.
In Erdoğan’s mind, Kanal Istanbul will be a boost to the staggering economy, but more importantly, it will be a way to change the direction of capital, writes journalist Bahadır Özgür: “Kanal Istanbul is the story of Turkish capitalism as well as political Islam’s neoliberal transformation.”
Since the project was announced, real estate speculation has skyrocketed. Lately, the news was that Seyha Moza, the mother of Şeyh Temim bin Hamed el-Sani, who happens to be the Emir of Qatar, has established a company and bought 44 acres of land where Kanal Istanbul is to be built. So far, nobody has refuted this claim.
Kanal Istanbul is not only critical for Erdoğan financially. It also represents a political battlefield in which he wishes to beat his opponents, in this case the new opposition Istanbul Metropolitan Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu.
In the beginning of December, harsh words between the two leaders were exchanged. While Erdoğan pointed out that Kanal Istanbul “will be a big splash in the world” and scolded İmamoğlu “to sit down and mind his own business,” İmamoğlu, who usually counters claims in a mild manner, replied sharply: “We will not say yes to any project that some want to make a splash out of but which will be a betrayal of Istanbulites.” İmamoğlu went on to say that he was chosen not to sit around, but do his job, which entails promoting the rights and interests of people.
Erdoğan has signaled that he will move forward aggressively with the Kanal Istanbul project, just as he did for several other mega projects. But for the first time, İmamoğlu has stood up decisively against this. Before the local elections, he promised to do so. However, what will İmamoğlu and his party, the CHP, do when heavy machinery enters to excavate? Does he have the power stand up against this unlawful act, or will he simply say that they will “seek their rights in court”? Since Turkish courts are a mechanism of the government, what can he achieve?
It seems that Kanal Istanbul will be the second battlefield for both Erdoğan and İmamoğlu, after the re-run of the local elections on June 23. İmamoğlu won a great victory then, and he will win a greater one if he succeeds in stopping the “crazy project” called Kanal Istanbul. The battlefield of Istanbul will also have a great effect on the upcoming presidential elections.
Some medical experts in Turkey argue that the hospitals which were previously emptied by the AKP government, can easily be ransformed into functioning hospitals with minimal spending to treat COVID-19 patients. One might wonder why they were closed in the first place.
Turkey has one of the world’s fastest growing coronavirus outbreaks, confirmed cases double every three days. The statistics, combined with the capacity of the health system and nature of the restrictions raise great concerns. Doctors are forced to apologize for their critical remarks, health workers are banned from making press releases on their conditions. Aside […]
The last time President Erdoğan, who is 66 years-old, physically took part in a meeting was a week ago. Nobody asks whether the President and his close circle have been tested for coronavirus. And of course, no one dares to ask what happens if he gets sick, and what the Turkish Presidential System would bring.
The Covid-19 will inevitably affect a much wider population, and Turkey’s limited testing is dramatic. Scientists, doctors unanimously urge for a radical testing procedure. In Istanbul, a city of 16 million, there are only four hospitals conducting tests. Meanwhile, states of emergency, strict restrictions and bans are anything but new in Turkey!
As he traveled back to Turkey from Azerbaijan, Erdoğan ominously announced a new wave of repression. A few days later, Osman Kavala was re-arrested, the mayor of Diyarbakır Selçuk Mızraklı was sentenced to more than 9 years in jail and 7 journalists were arrested.
Again we see them on the news, migrants flocking to the borders and the human traffickers going about their “business” in front of the cameras. As thousands of migrants seek to cross the border from Turkey to Greece and Bulgaria- some getting injured and dying whilst doing so - authorities talk of them as if they are cheap tokens. Not only in Turkey but in the EU countries as well.
The pro-governmental media in Turkey, which usually targets well-known individuals or critics, targets ordinary people as well. But what’s perhaps more worth talking about is how the life of the poor living in cities has changed — and how they are perceived. They, too, want to live a good life. Or just to be a part of it, even for a few seconds. And they, too, want to show off.
Just as Kavala was preparing for his release after 840 days spent in the Silivri Prison, the prosecutor’s office announced the philanthropist would be questioned on “attempting to overthrow the constitutional order." This proves how partial, arbitrary and politically involved the Turkish judiciary is. Yet the dynamics of this process remain unclear.
It’s hard to voice opposition to war when the coffins of slain soldiers are being sent back from Syria and when the nationalist mood is in full swing. However HDP deputy and former journalist Ahmet Şık, who has been jailed twice and is still tried on the Cumhuriyet case, says that they have the responsibility to question why so many young people are dying for.
The watchmen will not operate under a specific law or the constitution but under the government’s direct orders. Opposition parties thus warn of a “parallel police force” that enjoys unprecedented powers. At night, the watchmen could well turn into the state’s moral police.
Although the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled for his immediate release on Dec. 10, 2019, Osman Kavala remains as the only defendant under detention at the Gezi trial. So the question is whether the Council of Europe (CoE) and member states will stand up. If they will not do that, what is the function of the ECHR and why should other states bother to follow its rules?
Well-known economists have questioned how Kanal Istanbul will be financed, but they haven’t yet received any answers. Prof. Dr. Haluk Levent from Bilgi University believes that Kanal Istanbul is a Ponzi scheme, but with a difference: in a Ponzi Scheme, everything must be on the record, but this is not the case for Kanal Istanbul. The scheme is changing the town planning and zoning.
The media almost totally neglects or misinterprets cases related to July 15 in fear of being targeted themselves. On the other hand, high-ranking Gülenists, who have long fled the country, are in fact using the cases and prison sentences for their own PR.
Despite the government's pledge to combat femicide and domestic abuse, 474 women were murdered by men in 2019 in Turkey. Women’s rights advocates have repeatedly said the system is too weak to protect women.
Data from the last two years in Turkey points to a steady decrease in almost every aspect of a functioning, healthy democracy, such as freedom of speech, quality of education, gender and income equality, and the rule of law. It’s no surprise that society has become unhappier compared to 2017. Surely the AKP-MHP alliance is responsible for this great social, economic and political collapse.
Two days ago I went to the forth hearing of the Gezi trial in Silivri, where Kavala is the only imprisoned suspect among 16 civil society activists accused with ‘organizing and financing Gezi protests to overthrow the AKP government’ back in 2013. These trials are top examples of how rule of law is undermined and how human rights abuses are executed.
General elections appear to be on the agenda in 2023. That is what statements from President Erdoğan and his alliance partner, the MHP leader Bahçeli, suggest. Yet, the prospect of snap elections also looms. Many politicians, economists and journalists claim snap elections will be held in 2020. While snap elections may not seem logical, logics don’t apply to Turkish politics.
The severe violations of sick prisoners rights are against the law and contradict with international agreements Turkey partakes in. Human right advocates accuse the government of being unwilling to address these problems and point to the The European Council, which remains silent.
Just a few hours before police teargassed women in the streets of Istanbul, Emine Erdoğan, wife of President Tayyip Erdoğan, was giving a speech that denounced violence against women on the occasion of the International Day for Eliminating Violence against Women. However, Mrs. Erdoğan has also stated that the rise in violence against women is just a perception and that today, thanks to the AKP, women can ask for their rights.
As a journalist, I find it to be embarrassing and paradoxical that President Trump, not known to be a supporter of the free press, mocked the Turkish press.
Yet his words, “You sure you’re a reporter? You don’t work for Turkey with that question?” reflect the truth regarding the group of people Erdoğan took along with him to Washington. These words sum up the status of the Turkish mainstream media.
Turkey generally does not rank high in suicide rates. One reason is religion; in Islam suicide is a sin. Culture and family ties also are among strong reasons why people refrain from taking their lives according to experts. However figures show that there is a rise in suicide rates in Turkey. The society does not only suffer from economical crisis and neo-liberalism, but also a harsh transformation from a hybrid democracy to a more authoritarian state.
Last week, another bunch of journalists were sacked from daily Hürriyet newspaper, which is still considered as the “flagship” of the mainstream media. In fact, Hürriyet lost its prestige long while ago. It doesn’t really matter who the editor in chief is now. Or why and how journalists were sacked. It is the final nail in the coffin. The mainstream media resembles the living death.
By looking at mainstream media, military salutes of popular figures or twitter trending topics, one might assume that Turkish people were heavily supporting the military operation in Northern Syria -officially called “Operation Peace Spring” ending in 8 days- no matter what the rest of the world says. When there is any military action in Turkey or outside its borders, it becomes even harder for critical voices to be heard.
Associate Professor Şık was the deputy director of the Food Safety and Agricultural Research Center at Akdeniz University. Then, due to his scientific research, he became an enemy of the state.