İYİ Party (The Good Party) is the most critical party in the Turkish parliament. It is an opposition party the government cannot ignore. Yet, as demonstrated during the last legislative term that started on Oct. 1, 2019 and ended on July 29 at 7:14 a.m., after the passing of the social media censure law, just before the parliament entered its summer break, this does not mean it is a critical party as such.
In a political landscape dominated by men, it is noteworthy that the leader of İYİ Party is a woman. But as the government attempts to polarize society over nationalism, İYİ Party should be wary.
As Turkish politics have been reduced to a binary dichotomy between the government bloc and the opposition, İYİ Party plays a somewhat unifying and dampening effect in that regard. But while the government is out of touch with the people, the opposition is not tuned in with it either. When the people react fiercely to an issue, the opposition steps in as it realizes that the given issue has become popular. The opposition does little more than that.
In light of this, İYİ Party, which does its political homework, has strongly established its position and seeks to unify society, plays a critical role. Yet it remains insufficient.
While İYİ Party leader Meral Akşener is almost the only leader that keeps the parliamentary system on the agenda, the party itself is not as active as its leader in parliament. Bills pass in parliament behind closed doors, during flimsy general assemblies and after poorly conducted committee work. After all of that, bills pass with a 90 percent affirmative vote.
Certain opposition deputies claim nothing can be achieved through parliament, further contributing to the public’s distancing from the parliament, which, in fact, should serve as the country’s most democratic institution.
The opposition, which has 245 deputies, can never reach more than 200 votes during voting sessions in parliament. They have an average of 47 negative votes, which only tarnishes their image.
On January 2, the opposition bloc cast 182 negative votes against the Libya bill, which authorized the use of military force and 162 negative votes against the parallel bar associations bill. As for the partial amnesty bill, which introduced pardons for mafia members on April 13, only 50 opposition deputies voted against it. For the Africa Development Bank bill on March 25, only 13 negative votes were cast overall. And we all remember that only 36 deputies voted against the bill that overlooked the illegitimate operations of thermal power plants.
Hence, İYİ Party must do something to change this and restore the parliament’s crucial democratic role.
Throughout the 27th legislative term that began on Oct. 1, 2019 and ended after passing the social media censure law on July 29, 118 parliamentary sessions were held. Only 21 of them had to do with passing bills. On January 14, 15 and 28 and on April 7, only international agreements were voted and during those four sessions, a total of 31 international deals were ratified.
In 16 sessions, 24 laws and omnibus laws were passed in parliament.
In short, by coming to parliament only 118 times, one can participate in all general assemblies. If a deputy attends parliament for 21 days, they can vote for 55 laws. But regarding these 24 laws, let us examine the situation of the powers within the parliament.
During this legislative year, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) was able to carry out propaganda by using the tools of the state. They were present in parliament with their 291 deputies and participated in these 24 votes at a turnout rate of 76 percent.
The Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), which is a partner in the government coalition and used the means provided by AK Party, was present in parliament with its 49 deputies and had a participation rate of 59 percent in these 24 votes. It was highly involved.
What did İYİ Party do with its 37 deputies? While they were able to use 100 votes in these 24 bills, they only used 30 votes. In other words, İYİ Party, which has 37 deputies in parliament, acted as if it had 11 deputies. What is more, only 20 of these 30 votes were negative.
İYİ Party was never the first party to publicize a parliamentary bill. Though they are present in all committees, they never use it to the benefit the people. Their performance in parliament is weak. They have deputies who have never casted a negative vote. Some have never casted a vote at all. We wouldn’t even have noticed them if it hadn’t been for the Libya bill, which 34 deputies opposed.
While the leader of İYİ Party is not a member of parliament, she persistently keeps the parliamentary system on the agenda. Still, her deputies are not as active as she is in parliament. If they were, wouldn’t the situation be different?
With its deputies, advisors and its general administrative council, the party has nearly 200-person staff. As it is, it is larger than all of the country’s think tanks. It is the fifth largest party in parliament. Hence, if it held a debate over the strengthening of the parliamentary regime, with a foot in parliament, many things would change.
For instance, if they were to become a party that would publicize – within the first 24 hours – all bills that are brought into parliament, if they shared each committee meeting and if they opened their committee works to the public, wouldn’t it make a difference?
And if they opened their general assembly processes to the public, if they carried out a full court and all present parliament work with its 37 deputies, they would become the party that makes a difference in this country.
Only then would they reciprocate their leader’s call for a “strengthened parliamentarian regime.”
With such an approach, İYİ Party would be the voice of the people that long for a more democratic system. It may not make them a truly critical party. They would have to include all other parties in the process. But at least, they would be a critical party in parliament.
During the past legislative term, the government passed 24 laws with an average of 250 deputies. The average of opposition deputies that voted against bills was 47. Had İYİ Party mobilized, this figure wouldn’t be 47. The government would have found 247 deputies opposing it.
İYİ Party is the parliament’s most critical party. It can demonstrate this by showing the role and power of its much-desired “strengthened parliamentarian system” through the parliament itself.
Today, Ankara is not Wuhan. Wuhan is a good example compared to our capital city. Today, Ankara is a construction site. Ankara residents have to remind the city again that they do not want a municipal administration that works for contractors — alongside a presidential system that works for contractors.
This good news about the discovery of natural gas reserves in the Black Sea at the same time means a disaster for the environment. Turkey is a country in which environmental protection standards are very low, and it cannot control even this. This project will be the end of the Black Sea.
In the past four months, none of our municipalities prepared the infrastructure for washing our hands. They were not able to meet the sidewalk conditions of 1.5 meters width for the social distancing of pedestrians. Almost all of our 1,397 municipalities have failed according to these criteria, including opposition ones.
Even though there are now 163,000 cases detected in Turkey and even more cases that are undetected, the malls are opening. At what cost and for whose sake they are opening? It is quite apparent that they are not opening for our sake; the data is clear. When you review the equation from the point of view of the novel coronavirus, then you have five huge reasons not to step inside these malls.
In Turkey, the pandemic seems to have also opened asphalt season for some local administrations. Municipalities regarded this period as a huge opportunity to pave asphalt.
The Energy Ministry’s 2019-2023 Strategic Plan tells us a lot about the government's intentions. It is obviously a plan that still insists on coal and hydroelectric power policies, and that has solar and wind energy only as an accessory. The climate crisis is not even mentioned.
The first coronavirus month in Turkey will be recorded in history as the month of opportunism, the month of abusing a pandemic. It kept some of its people at home and others at mines and factories, turning the country into a labor camp. Only the local administrations were left, but there were policies to curb their powers as well.
As a host to 85 percent of all international travels, Istanbul has become an attraction center for coronavirus. And as a host to 38 percent of Turkey’s domestic travels, Istanbul spread the virus to the rest of the country.
The Turkish government has not taken steps related to the seriousness of the coronavirus outbreak. They actually took steps in the opposite direction asking people to do their own homework and resisting a total lockdown in the country. Meanwhile, the opposition self-quarantined itself politically.
Both the stage that the capitalism has reached globally and Turkey’s implementation of it, cannot be neglected while discussing the underlying factors which tie the climate crisis and the COVID-19 outbreak to each other.
In 2019, the number of issues broke the record with 935 extreme meteorological issues recorded in Turkey. That's 9 times the overall number recorded for the second half of the 20th century. Last year, floods occurred in cities including Ordu, Düzce, Trabzon, Antalya and Mersin that cost the lives of many people.
While Russia needs to sell its energy to Turkey, the US must stay within the Middle East to get its oil. That is why they are both seeking Turkey on their side.At the moment, Turkey is paying for the Syrian war with its loved ones and poverty. It is only by achieving peace with its neighbors that we can attain a win-win situation.
Thanks to a Special Communication Tax that was introduced after the 1999 earthquake, some 67.5 billion Turkish Liras have been collected up to now for earthquake relief. But rather than on earthquake preparedness, the money was largely spent on construction projects.
Kanal Istanbul is a project based on unjust profit-earning that is well-known first to Turkish companies, followed by Arab, European, and even Pakistani capital owners. But we still don’t know the full truth of what is going on with the project. Good that we do not know, because if we did, the Kanal Istanbul project would end immediately.
According to OECD data, Turkey allocated 289 million dollars for waste management in 2008. Ever since, the country has developed and grown, right? Despite this, the money allocated for waste management fell to 147 million dollars in 2015. We have a government that does not want to manage waste and spend money on it. Burying trash is easy; the soil is free.
President Erdoğan's government recently suffered two fiascos, one involved thermal power plants while the other had to do with a plan to rescue the private company “Simit Sarayı”. So why would it press forward with the Kanal Istanbul project?
It is possible for us to close down all coal mines! The way to this has been paved with the veto on the proposed bill. But if we leave public policy unattended and representatives continue to leave parliament seats empty, the opposite will happen. I should point out as a warning that, just like the Environment and City Planning Minister could actually be referring to the business schedule when he says “we installed a filter in 6 months,” a similar wordplay could be at hand with the veto. We will go after the answer together, I promise.
We know how much the ministry earned from shopping bags in the first nine months of the year. At 25 kuruş (cents) for each nylon bag, 15 kuruş were deposited to the ministry and the total was 188 million lira. You heard it right, 18.8 billion kuruş.
The Ministry of Forestry routinely opens up forest ecosystems for economic exploitation. It distributes permits to use forests for mineral exploitation, mining, construction and even for oil drilling. In 2012, 2,810 permits were granted for those purposes. Between 2012 and 2018, that number rose to 18,515.
The government has found a way to take back the Bosphorus after losing İstanbul elections. The Ministry of Environment and Urbanization has drafted a 28 point legislative proposal called the Boshporus Law. With the new law, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality and four provinces no longer have any authority in the Bosphorus.
Volkswagen's investment plan in Turkey is a scandal. It is no less than an attempt to rescue a drowning company ensnared in corruption. While the Turkish public will bear the economic costs of this plan, environmental damage will also be caused.
Erdoğan changed the climate of the UN Climate Action Summit. He talked about how he multiplied fossil fuels and how not recycling waste is a good thing, and he put concrete as a policy on the world stage.
Turkey wants to be a party to the Paris Agreement as the structure of the deal allows countries to increase emissions. Turkey, which is among the 12 countries that have not yet joined the agreement, had added 193.5 million tons to climate changing greenhouse gases in last 20 years before 2010.